Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Richard McKenzie v. Maureen Rossi-Hill, et al
as 10-35672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
MAUREEN ROSSI-HILL, T. CUTLER, THERESA HICKS and others
Richard McKenzie v. Maureen Rossi-Hill, et al
as 10-35101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD L. MCKENZIE
Defendant - Appellee:
MAUREEN ROSSI-HILL, T. CUTLER, THERESA HICKS and others
Gregorio Funtanilla, Jr. v. Karen Kelly, et al
as 09-17209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORIO C. FUNTANILLA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN KELLY, Senior Psychologist, MICHAEL JAFFE, Psychiatrist, RICHARD LIPON, Psychiatrist and others
Jose Gonzalez, et al v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 09-56326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE M. GONZALEZ and JEFFREY DEAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN MAYBERG, MELVIN HUNTER, JON DEMORALES and others
David Hooper v. Argenta Township, Battle Mount, et al
as 09-16611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID OWENS HOOPER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID OWENS HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ARGENTA TOWNSHIP, BATTLE MOUNTAIN NEVADA, FRANK A. BERTRAND, KEVIN R. BRIGGS and others
Frank Fernandez v. Susan Risenhoover, et al
as 09-16279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK J. FERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN RISENHOOVER, MICHAEL SAYRE, C. E. WILBER and others
Arlen Smith v. Michael Washington, et al
as 09-35157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLEN PORTER SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL WASHINGTON, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Oregon State Board of Parole, LENN HANNON, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Oregon State Board of Parole, DARCY BAKER, individually and in her official capacity as a member of the Oregon State Board of Parole and others
Robert Woodroffe v. Oregon Department of Correctio, et al
as 08-35604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MAX WILLIAMS, STEVE SHELTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
