Cases 21 - 30 of 96
John Pierce v. Lawrence Ende
as 16-17011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. PIERCE, AKA John Pierce
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE ENDE
Seavon Pierce v. Sacramento News and Review, et al
as 16-16740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO NEWS AND REVIEW, MODESTO BEE, NEW YORK TIMES NEWS and others
Seavon Pierce v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 16-16722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, ANTHONY DA SILVA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama
as 16-16523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, President
Seavon Pierce v. President Barack Obama, et al
as 16-56194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, Attorney General, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General and others
Seavon Pierce v. CDCR, et al
as 16-16465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and LANCASTER STATE PRISON
Seavon Pierce v. Scott McEwen
as 16-56177
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT MCEWEN, Warden, also known as J. Sullivan, also known as Anthony Hedgpeth
Mitchell Varnell v. Kenneth Sawyer, et al
as 16-35659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL LEE VARNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH SAWYER, CHARLES CASEY, HOWARD YARDLEY and others
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 15-35668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 14-35823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
