Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
William Zielinski v. Diehl, et al
as 12-35157
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM ZIELINSKI
Defendant - Appellee: DIEHL, Doctor, in his official and individual capacity, VANHOUTEN, Doctor, In his individual and official capacity, H. MILLER, in his individual and official capacity and others
Rodney Garrott v. Kevin Bowen, et al
as 11-35932
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY L. GARROTT
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN BOWEN, MARK A. KUCZA, GAINES and others
Justin Dobson, et al v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 11-35873
Plaintiff: JUSTIN DOBSON
Plaintiff - Appellant: GERALD LEE WHITEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: ELDON VAIL, MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, ROBERT HERZOG and others
Lerajjarean Ra-o-kel-ly v. Rodney Schlienz, et al
as 11-35295
Plaintiff - Appellant: LERAJJAREAN RA-O-KEL-LY
Defendant - Appellee: RODNEY W. SCHLIENZ, PAM SONNEN, JEFFREY ZMUDA and others
Lerajjareanra Kelly v. Jeffery Zmuda, et al
as 10-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant: LERAJJAREANRA O. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFERY D. ZMUDA, BRENT REINKE, PAM SONNEN and others
Justin Dobson, et al v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35726
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUSTIN DOBSON, GEORGE T. HICKS, ROGER MICHAEL HOTRUM and others
Defendant - Appellee: ELDON VAIL, MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, ROBERT HERZOG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35253
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brian Snoke v. John/Jane Doe
as 09-56597
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIAN LAWRENCE SNOKE
Defendant: JOHN & JANE DOE
Michael Carroll v. Mary Lee, et al
as 09-35852
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee: MARY J. LEE, BROOKS RAYMOND, LAURA DYER and others
John Townsend v. Adam Endel, et al
as 08-17235
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. TOWNSEND
Defendant - Appellee: ADAM ENDEL, D. W. NEVIN, MACARTHUR, Dr. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?