Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Buck Moore v. Jordet, et al
as 12-35270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BUCK DANIEL MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
JORDET, GEILS, SAMSON and others
Sheldon McIntosh v. Shelton Richardson, et al
as 12-15086
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHELDON MCINTOSH
Respondent - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Samora McIntosh v. Shelton Richardson, et al
as 11-18052
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMORA MCINTOSH
Respondent - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Theodore McDowell v. Shelton Richardson, et al
as 11-17822
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE CUSH MCDOWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Daisy Daniels v. Andrea Richardson, et al
as 11-17492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAISY DANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREA RICHARDSON, Phoenix Police, JOHN MODRICK, Phoenix Police, NATHAN SMITH, Phoenix Police and others
USA v. Bryan Richardson
as 11-17001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON
Reginald Bell, Sr. v. City of Tukwila, et al
as 11-35533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD BELL, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUKWILA, TUKWILA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK DUNLAP and others
Bryan Richardson v. Francisco Quintana, et al
as 11-55902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCISCO QUINTANA, Warden, PRIETO, Correctional Officer and SYLVESTER, DHO
Alvin Richardson v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-15033
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVIN RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, California Men's Colony
Lerajjareanra Kelly v. Jeffery Zmuda, et al
as 10-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREANRA O. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY D. ZMUDA, BRENT REINKE, PAM SONNEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
