Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Matthew White v. Rene Baker, et al
as 16-16638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
RENE BAKER, M. BYRNE, T. SANDOVAL and others
Joe Scott, Jr. v. Renee Baker, et al
as 16-16644
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE NATHAN SCOTT, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnny Jones, III v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 16-16528
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE JONES, III
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Max Reed, II v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 16-16413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAX REED, II
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ELY STATE PRISON and others
Charles Manley v. Michael Rowley, et al
as 15-15320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MANLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROWLEY, Officer, ALAN ZIMMER, GLENN HAMMOCK and others
Paul Browning v. Renee Baker, et al
as 15-99002
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL L. BROWNING
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and ADAM PAUL LAXALT, Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Amicus Curiae:
INNOCENCE NETWORK
Jose Echavarria v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 15-99001
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOSE L. ECHAVARRIA
Respondent - Appellant:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, TIMOTHY FILSON, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Esquire, Attorney General and others
William Witter v. Renee Baker, et al
as 14-99010
Petitioner - Appellee:
WILLIAM WITTER
Respondent - Appellant:
RENEE BAKER and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTRO
Maximilliano Cisneros v. Renee Baker, et al
as 14-16839
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAXIMILLIANO CISNEROS
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Anthony Prentice v. Renee Baker, et al
as 14-16766
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY PRENTICE
Respondent - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
