Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Anthony Sims v. CDCR, et al
as 23-15773
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY SIMS
Respondent / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and THERESA CISNEROS, Warden
Matthew Faison v. Clive Davis, et al
as 22-16061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIVE DAVIS, JOYCE STREET SIMS and VALERIE SIMPSON
Quincy Sims v. C. Wegman, et al
as 18-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCY SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. WEGMAN, Community Resource Manager at Kern Valley State Prison, C. BOWMAN, Chaplain at Kern Valley State Prison, M. SEARMAN, Correctional Counselor II at Kern Valley State Prison and others
Roberto Chaidez v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 18-15885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO CHAIDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director, GEORGE GIURBINO, ROES, Mr. and others
Rickey Sims v. S. Zavala
as 18-15655
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICKEY LEE SIMS
Defendant - Appellant:
S. ZAVALA, Correctional Officer
Quincy Sims v. C. Wegman, et al
as 17-16767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCY SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. WEGMAN, Community Resource Manager at Kern Valley State Prison, C. BOWMAN, Chaplain at Kern Valley State Prison, M. SEARMAN, Correctional Counselor II at Kern Valley State Prison and others
Quincy Sims v. M. Biter
as 17-15359
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUINCY SIMS
Respondent - Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Lamonte Sims v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 17-55028
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMONTE DESHAWN SIMS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
Paul Adams v. B. Roe, et al
as 16-56734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
B. ROE, Custody Captain at I.S.P., individual capacity, K. DAVIS, Appeals Coordinator for inmate appeals, individual capacity, DAVID B. LONG, Prison Warden Superintendant, individual capacity and others
Quincy Sims v. M. Cabrera
as 16-16783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINCY SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CABRERA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
