Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,469
David Ditto v. Jeffrey Beard
as 23-55658
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID PATRICK DITTO
Respondent / Appellee: JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Michael Grant v. Ronald Broomfield
as 23-55605
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL DAVID GRANT
Respondent / Appellee: RONALD BROOMFIELD
Larry Dunlap v. Ryan Thornell, et al
as 23-15962
Petitioner / Appellant: LARRY DONNELL DUNLAP
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, RYAN THORNELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Dennis Jones v. David Shinn
as 23-15958
Petitioner / Appellant: DENNIS JONES
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director
Keenan Wilkins v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15934
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEENAN G. WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee: JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, TIMOTHY M. LOCKWOOD and others
Shawn Goff v. Trinity Services Group, et al
as 23-15929
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHAWN CHARLES GOFF
Defendant / Appellee: TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC, THOMPSON, Unknown ; Warden and others
Alfred Caraffa v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15926
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALFRED E. CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, UNKNOWN PARTY, Paralegal, ASPC Tucson, BYRD, Unknown; Correctional Officer and others
David Fink v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-55546
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID FINK
Respondent / Appellee: KATHLEEN ALLISON
Edward Ware v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15899
Petitioner / Appellant: EDWARD MAURICE WARE
Respondent / Appellee: ` DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and RYAN THORNELL
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent: UNKNOWN PARTY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?