Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 23-15567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
DeWitt Long v. Gray, et al
as 23-15475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWITT LAMAR LONG
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAY, named as Correctional Officer Ms. Gray at Saguaro Correctional Center; Unknown, HILL, named as Correctional Officer Mr. Hill at Saguaro Correctional Center; Unknown, REILAND, named as Case Manager Mr. Reiland at Saguaro Correctional Center; Unknown and others
Daniel Cobb v. Catricia Howard, et al
as 22-16725
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CATRICIA HOWARD, Complex warden at USP-Tucson, K WERNER, SOMP Coordinator/ Psychologist at USP-Tucson, L UNRUH-PARKER, SOMP Psychologist at USP-Tucson and others
DeWitt Long v. Gray, et al
as 22-15647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWITT LAMAR LONG
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAY, named as Correctional Officer Ms. Gray at Saguaro Correctional Center, REILAND, named as Case Manager Mr. Reiland at Saguaro Correctional Center, OLSEN, named as Unit Manager Ms. Olsen at Saguaro Correctional Center and others
DeWitt Long v. Gray, et al
as 22-15423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWITT LAMAR LONG
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAY, named as Correctional Officer Ms. Gray at Saguaro Correctional Center, REILAND, named as Case Manager Mr. Reiland at Saguaro Correctional Center, OLSEN, named as Unit Manager Ms. Olsen at Saguaro Correctional Center and others
Francis Grandinetti, II v. J. Alexander, et al
as 18-15044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI II
Defendant - Appellee:
J. ALEXANDER, C. M. RILEY, J. FLORES and others
Nicholas Alexander v. USA
as 13-35285
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. ALEXANDER, Nicholas Alexander Kamerling
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
