Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clifford Jackson, Jr. v. Neil McDowell
as 17-16922
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD L. JACKSON, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Michael Carroll v. Kelsey Stewart, et al
as 17-35419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CARROLL
Defendant - Appellee:
KELSEY STEWART, CCO2, JILL M. CHAMBERLIN, Individually and as well as in her official capacity as a CCS, JUAN JOSE HERNANDEZ, Individually and as well as in his official capacity as a CCO and others
Billy Birdwell, II v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-17345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY PAUL BIRDWELL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, N. GRANNIS, R. SUBIA and others
Fateem Jackson v. CDCR, et al
as 12-15880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FATEEM L. JACKSON
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CARRASCO, Chief Deputy Warden, D. ZANCHI, Captain, Y. PANTOJA, Correctional Officer and others
Clifford Jackson, Jr. v. Mike McDonald
as 12-15570
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD L. JACKSON, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
MIKE MCDONALD
Anthony Clarke v. A. Scribner, et al
as 09-17492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY CLARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, TORRES, D. K. STOCKMAN and others
Clifford Jackson v. Monterey County Jail, et al
as 09-16618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD L. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTEREY COUNTY JAIL, NOVA PARTNER INC., SKANSKA USA BUILDING INC. and others
Fateem Jackson v. M. Robinson, et al
as 09-16552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FATEEM L. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ROBINSON, Correctional Officer, G. ALLEN, Correctional Sgt., P. MATZEN, Correctional Lt. and others
Fateen Jackson v. Victor Almager
as 08-55934
Petitioner - Appellant:
FATEEN L. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
VICTOR ALMAGER, Warden
Anthony Robinson v. Gray Davis, et al
as 08-15632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAY DAVIS, Govenor, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
