Cases 1 - 10 of 132
David Lack v. Posner, et al
as 23-55522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID LACK and DAVID JAMES LACK
Defendant / Appellee:
POSNER, Dr; CTF Soledad Prison Chief Medical Officer, BRIAN COTA, DDA, CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden, CTF Soledad Warden and others
Esequiel Garcia v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 23-15587
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESEQUIEL GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden and RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden
Orlando Sanchez v. Neil McDowell
as 23-55073
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORLANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Benjamin Freeman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director at ADOCRR, J MACADOREY, Complex Warden, D QUINTERO, Deputy Warden at Cibola, Yuma and others
Jason Cai v. Neil McDowell
as 22-16636
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON CAI
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Daniel Frazer v. Neil McDowell
as 22-16610
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL FRAZER
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Joseph Pitts v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 22-16599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
NOLAN ESPINDA, FRANCIS SEQUIERA, CAESAR ALTERIS, AKA Caesar Altaris and others
Mike Taituave v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 22-55862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE TAITUAVE
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Warden, Ironwood State Prison, individual, F. ALVEREZ, Correctional Lieutenant for the Investigative Services Unit at I.S.P., individual, J. FRIAS, Correctional Sergeant for the Investigative Services Unit at I.S.P., individual and others
Neil Breitbard v. CDCR, et al
as 22-55793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEIL BREITBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, GUILLERMO VIERA ROSA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Clifford Jackson v. Neil McDowell
as 22-55607
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD D. JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
