Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Steven Hummert v. Lance Hetmer, et al
as 20-16283
Defendant:
WALTER HENSLEY, STACEY CRABTREE, G. THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MUNZ, First Name Unknown and LANCE HETMER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN HENRY HUMMERT
Sheldon Walker v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 18-16120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELDON B. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, MIKE LINDERMAN, Administrator of Pastoral Activities at Central Office, VICKLUND, Senior Chaplain at Eyman Complex and others
Armando Aros v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, GEORGE HERMAN, STGVC Chairperson, JEFFREY FREELAND, Deputy Warden and others
Armando Aros v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-16082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO ROBERTO AROS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, GEORGE HERMAN, STGVC Chairperson, JEFFREY FREELAND, Deputy Warden and others
Jonathan McAllister, Sr. v. Bette Carrillo, et al
as 12-17625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN MCALLISTER, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
BETTE CARRILLO, PAUL LOUIS, RON SCHMIDT and others
Karl Guillen v. Quincy Owens, et al
as 12-16298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL LOUIS GUILLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
QUINCY OWENS, Deputy Warden at ASPC/Lewis RSAT, in his individual and official capacities, CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Chuck Ryan, ADC Director at ADC Central Office, in his individual and official capacities, B. ROBERTS, CO IV at ASPC/Lewis RAST, in his individual and official capacities and others
Randy Bailey v. Maxwell, et al
as 09-15261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY SCOTT BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAXWELL, CO IV-Administrator Offender Services at Phoenix Central Office, sued in individual and official capacity., FANSLER, CO III, sued in his/her individual & official capacity also known as Fahzler, CONRAD LUNA, Deputy Warden, sued in his individual & official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
