Cases 11 - 20 of 55
County of Maui v. Chevron USA Inc., et al
as 21-15318
Defendant / Appellant:
BP AMERICA, INC., CHEVRON USA INC., ALOHA PETROLEUM LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MAUI
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD BOWMAN MYERS, United States Air Force General (Retired), MICHAEL GLENN MULLEN, United States Navy Admiral (Retired) and others
Horizon Christian School, et al v. Kate Brown
as 21-35005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HORIZON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, JASON NISSEN, ASHLEY CADONAU and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, Governor, State of Oregon
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS, INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM, METHODIST FEDERATION
Kara Gordon, et al v. State Bar of California, et al
as 20-16899
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS and DONNA HERSHKOWITZ, in her official capacity as Interim Executive Director of the State Bar of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, ISABEL CALLEJO-BRIGHTON and KARA GORDON
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Stephen Young v. University of Hawai'i, et al
as 20-16764
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS, STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN ROBERT NEALE YOUNG
Stephen Young v. USDC-HI
as 20-72540
Not Classified By Court:
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, In re: STEPHEN ROBERT NEALE YOUNG, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ROBERT NEALE YOUNG
Erling Calkins, et al v. Southern California ConferenceIn re: Erling Calkins, et al v. Southern California Conference
as 20-60033
Debtor:
ELAINE S. CALKINS and In re: ERLING S. CALKINS
Appellant:
ERLING S. CALKINS
Appellee:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS, Trustee
Stephen Young v. University of Hawai'i, et al
as 20-16390
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS, STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN ROBERT NEALE YOUNG
South Bay United Pentecostal, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-55533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES III, an individual and SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California, HELEN ROBBINS-MEYER, in her official capacity as Director of Emergency Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE and BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS; DISCIPLES JUSTICE ACTION NETWORK; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; METHODIST FEDERATION FOR SOCIAL ACTION; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CHURCHES O
Wendy Gish, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-55445
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT LOVINGGOOD, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor, KAREN SPIEGEL, in her official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor, JANICE RUTHERFORD, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA WOOD, WENDY GISH, PATRICK SCALES and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN THE USA; RECONSTRUCTING JUDAISM; RECONSTRUCTIONIST RABBINICAL and FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
