Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Richard Crane v. S. Hatton, et al
as 14-15745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE
Defendant - Appellee:
S. HATTON, D. M. MANTEL, BIAGINI and others
Maurice Olivier v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-15467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE P. OLIVIER, AKA Maurice Pierre Olivier
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, R. WHITE, C. B. TUCKER and others
Travon Thompson v. Ron Hoops, et al
as 12-55277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVON THOMPSON
Defendant:
RON HOOPS, Sheriff
Defendant - Appellee:
D. M. BOLOT, Facility Administrator, VANDERKELLEN, individually and official capacity and RAMIER, individually and official capacity
Daniel Masterson v. Silvia Huerta-Garcia, et al
as 11-17389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MASTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SILVIA HUERTA-GARCIA, ROSANNE CAMPBELL, CDCR Correctional Manager, MICHAEL D. BUNNELL, Associate Warden and others
Norberto Medina v. James Hartley, et al
as 11-16899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORBERTO MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, D. M. MANTEL, Assistant Warden and A. LLOREN, Facility II Captain
Lynnard Smith v. Steven Davis, et al
as 09-15545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNNARD A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN G. DAVIS, D. M. BENEDETTI, J. VERA and others
Ernest Cox, Jr. v. Gregory Harris, et al
as 08-16252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST LEE COX, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY HARRIS, L. TREXLER, D. M. DUCKWORTH and others
Larry Cleveland v. T. Dennison, et al
as 08-55536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY CHARLES CLEVELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
T. DENNISON, In his individual capacity as Correctional Officer, D. K. WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity a Correctional Officer, S. WALLS, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer and others
Boulware v. Dunstan, et al
as 08-15241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. M. DUNSTAN, Sergeant, K. L. HOFFMAN, Lieutenant, L. M. TREXLER, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
