Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Simon Ranteesi v. Mark Constance, et al
as 13-16966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIMON F. RANTEESI
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK CONSTANCE, Dr., VACAVILLE URGENT CARE, SOLANO URGENT CARE and others
Ted Jensen v. Washington State Deptarment of, et al
as 12-35921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TED JENSEN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPTARMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDY KLINE, Correction Officer, Monroe Correction Complex and BRIAN SMITH, Correction Officer, Monroe Correction Complex
Archibald Cunningham v. Patrick Mahoney, et al
as 10-17863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIBALD CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. MAHONEY, San Francisco Superior Court Judge, Family Law Division, MARY WANG, Mother of Minor Child, MARIA SCHOPP, Lawyer in underlying action and others
Daniel Kline v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 10-16875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Daniel Kline v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 10-16478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL KLINE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Archibald Cunningham v. Patrick Mahoney, et al
as 10-16402
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIBALD CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. MAHONEY, San Francisco Superior Court Judge, Family Law Division, RONALD M. GEORGE, Administrative Law Judge, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Chair of California Judicial Council, JAMES MCBRIDE, Presiding Judge San Francisco Superior Court and others
Daniel Kline v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 10-16075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Michael Kline v. Dena Kline
as 10-15127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL KLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DENA R. KLINE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-35521
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-35657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
