Cases 21 - 30 of 254
Andre Wong, et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., et al
as 22-56113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE WONG, AMADO MUNOZ, CAROLYN HEIER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., a Delaware corporation and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Contreras-Chicas, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1481
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA MARISOL CONTRERAS-CHICAS and LESLIE VANESSA LOPEZ-CONTRERAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Larry Richards v. State of California Child Protective Services, et al
as 22-16033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY RICHARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, CLAUDIA, DENITA CARTER and others
Ramirez Lopez v. Garland
as 22-1137
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA RAMIREZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cortez-Barrera v. Garland
as 22-840
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA VIOLETA CORTEZ-BARRERA, MEILING VIOLETA PEREZ-CORTEZ and JOSE LEONARDO PEREZ-CORTEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores-Cabrera v. Garland
as 22-651
Petitioner:
YEIMI CLAUDIA FLORES-CABRERA and MELVIN JOSUE PEREZ-FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jessica Ploof v. State of Arizona, et al
as 22-15061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA PLOOF
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, MEAGAN TAFOYA, individually and as an employee with the State of Arizona Department of Child Safety and others
Jimenez-Acevedo v. Garland
as 21-1351
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA YAMILETH JIMENEZ-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Cornejo v. Garland
as 21-1187
Petitioner:
YANIRA BERFALIA RIVAS-CORNEJO and CLAUDIA ELIZABETH MEJIA-RIVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales Mosqueda v. Garland
as 21-982
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA MORALES MOSQUEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
