Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Jennifer Sansone, et al v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56158
Plaintiff / Appellant: ORDUNO BALDEMAR, Jr. and JENNIFER M. SANSONE, Individually and on Behalf of Other Members of the Public Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, DOES, 1-25, inclusive, TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC and others
Moses McCormick, et al v. Franklin County Court, et al
as 19-16538
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY S. ANDERSON, TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as FBI Columbus 2 Unknown Final Policy Enforcers; named as Deputy Clerk Steve in original complaint; named as Does 1 - 25, inclusive in original complaint and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK MCCORMICK and MOSES MCCORMICK
The Estate of Javier Garcia Ga, et al v. City of Santa Maria, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-56142
Plaintiff - Appellant: THE ESTATE OF JAVIER GARCIA GAONA, JR., JAVIER GARCIA GAONA and YOLANDA GARCIA, individually and as successors in interest to The Estate of Javier Garcia Gaona, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SANTA MARIA, SANTA MARIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ERNIE SALINAS and others
Marsha Doland v. Autozone Inc, et al
as 18-55536
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARSHA DOLAND, successor in interest to William Doland; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Appellee: AUTOZONE INC and DOES, 1-25, inclusive
Movant - Appellant: MARCUS BEYROUTI, Proposed Intervenor and FELIPE MONTELLANO, Proposed Intervenor
Marsha Doland v. Autozone Inc, et al
as 18-55274
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARSHA DOLAND, successor in interest to William Doland; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Appellee: AUTOZONE INC and DOES, 1-25, inclusive
Movant - Appellant: MARCUS BEYROUTI, Proposed Intervenor and FELIPE MONTELLANO, Proposed Intervenor
Marsha Doland v. Autozone Inc, et al
as 18-55273
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARSHA DOLAND, successor in interest to William Doland; individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public
Defendant - Appellee: AUTOZONE INC and DOES, 1-25, inclusive
Trinita Lattimore v. Euramax International, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-56819
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRINITA LATTIMORE
Defendant - Appellee: EURAMAX INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DOES, 1-25, inclusive
Marlet Jones v. Encore Credit Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-56473
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARLET JONES
Defendant - Appellee: ENCORE CREDIT CORP., U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Trustee as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities , SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Erroneously Sued As Select Portfolio Servicing, LLC and others
Rajesh Varma, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55639
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAJESH VARMA and MAHIMA VARMA
Defendant - Appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as successor in interest to America's Wholesale Lender its successors and/or assigns, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2006-AR6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR6, FKA The Bank of New York, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Dustin Chantel, et al v. Federated Rural Electric Insur, et al
as 17-15271
Plaintiff - Appellant: DUSTIN ROGER CHANTEL and ELIZABETH DARLENE CHANTEL
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERATED RURAL ELECTRIC INSURANCE EXCHANGE INCORPORATED and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: CEO's, Board Members, and Does 1-25 (inclusive

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?