Cases 21 - 30 of 402
Robert Pope v. People of the State of California, et al
as 22-56112
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT POPE
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and WARREN C. MONTGOMERY, Party of Interest
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant:
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Juan Molina v. W. Montgomery
as 22-55958
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN FRANCISCO MOLINA
Respondent / Appellee:
W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden
Gerald Bollfrass, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 22-16485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD BOLLFRASS and FRANK CZYZEWSKI, a married couple
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, PHOENIX HOUSING DEPARTMENT, named as The City of Phoenix Housing Department, a federally funded public housing program, DINA FERNANDEZ, an individual and others
Marlon Blacher v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER, AKA Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, ALL CALIPATRIA STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFFING PERSONS and others
Charles Allen v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, MARTINEZ, Food Manager and others
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant:
PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent:
JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant:
GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
