Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Protect Our Communities, et al v. Michael Black, et al
as 17-55647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION, DAVID HOGAN and NICA KNITE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BLACK, Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, Department of the Interior, KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
TULE WIND, LLC and EWIIAAPAAYP BAND OF KUMEYAAY INDIANS
Carol Carter, et al v. Kevin Washburn, et al
as 17-15839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL COGHLAN CARTER, next friend of A.D., C.C., L..G. and C.R., minors next friend of A.D. next friend of C.C. next friend of L.G. next friend of C.R., UNKNOWN PARTY, named as S.H., a married couple, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as J.H., a married couple and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Bureau of Indian Affairs, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, United States Department of the Interior and GREGORY MCKAY, named as Gregory A. McKay, in his official capacity as Director of Arizona Department of Child Safety
Cottonwood Environmental Law, et al v. U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, et al
as 17-35101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
U.S. SHEEP EXPERIMENT STATION, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Public Utility District No 1 o v. United States Department of th, et al
as 17-35064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO 1 OF KLICKITAT COUNTY, a Washington public utility district
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Gary Harrington v. State of Oregon, et al
as 16-36014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY HARRINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, a political sub-division of the United States of America, bound by the Constitution of the United States of America, 1789-1791, LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Attorney General, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, United States Department of Interior and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-35866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, GEORGE WUERTHNER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, in her official capacity, DAN ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in his official capacity and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
Jamul Action Committee, et al v. Jonodev Chaudhuri, et al
as 16-16442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMUL ACTION COMMITTEE, JAMUL COMMUNITY CHURCH, DARLA KASMEDO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JONODEV CHAUDHURI, Chairwoman of the National Indian Gaming Commission, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
County of Amador, et al v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, et al
as 15-17253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COUNTY OF AMADOR, California
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
IONE BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
The Chippewa Cree Tribe v. USDOI, et al
as 15-71772
Petitioner:
THE CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE OF THE ROCKY BOY RESERVATION, MONTANA
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
