Cases 31 - 40 of 259
Abryel Wilder, et al v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 21-35439
Plaintiff:
PARENT OF Y.C.M.W., PROPERTY OF 32328 7TH AVENUE SW, OWNER OF BURIAL SITE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ROBERT INSLEE, TIANNI SHANE HARRISON, et al. and DANIEL SATTERBERG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRYEL MICHOLE-MEENA WILDER
Donny Steward v. G. Thumser, et al
as 21-15820
Defendant / Appellee:
OLSON, HARRISON, DOOLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNY STEWARD
Harrison Kinsley v. Udemy, Inc.
as 21-15787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRISON SNOW KINSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UDEMY, INC., a Delaware Corporation
USA v. Harrison Johnson
as 21-10129
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRISON JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Barbee
as 21-30043
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES HARRISON BARBEE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Leanne Hensley v. ZGF Architects, et al
as 20-36098
Defendant / Appellee:
TED HYMAN, KATHY BERG, MITRA MEMARI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANNE J. HENSLEY
Patrina Harrison v. Whole Foods Market
as 20-17446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRINA HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
WHOLE FOODS MARKET
Constantino Basile v. The Los Angeles Film School, et al
as 20-56276
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT-CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, NANCY PELOSI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KRIPKE ENTERPRISES, a California corporation, MITCHELL, SILBERBERG AND KNUPP, a California Corporation, BEVERLY HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTANTINO BASILE
Robert Archer, et al v. Carnival Corporation, et al
as 20-80152
Petitioner:
BRENDA SKINNER, BILL J. EADS, Sr., DOROTHY OWEN and others
Respondent:
CARNIVAL PLC, PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD. and CARNIVAL CORPORATION
Ezzard Ellis v. C. Harrison
as 20-56061
Respondent / Appellee:
C. M. HARRISON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
EZZARD CHARLES ELLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
