Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-17352
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
SEC v. Vincent Messina, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-55325
Plaintiff - Appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: WORLD CAPITAL MARKET, INC., WCM777 INC., WCM777 LTD., DBA WCM777 Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: VINCENT J. MESSINA, Relief Defendant and INTERNATIONAL MARKET VENTURES, Relief Defendant
Securities and Exchange Commis v. Donald Gillispie, et al
as 14-35588
Plaintiff - Appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD L. GILLISPIE
Defendant: ALTERNATE ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC., JENNIFER RANSOM, BOSCO FINANCIAL, LLC and others
Securities and Exchange Commis v. Thomas C. Hebrank
as 14-56086
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Trustee - Appellee: RICHARD M. KIPPERMAN, as successor to Receiver
Movant - Appellant: JANET IHDE, Certain Limited Partners of Copeland Properties Three, Copeland Properties 14 and Copeland Properties 18, IRA, CHARLES SCHWAB, FBO, MELVYN ROSS, Certain Limited Partners of Copeland Properties Three, Copeland Properties 14 and Copeland Properties 18 and others
Receiver - Appellee: THOMAS C. HEBRANK
Javon Williams v. State of Arizona, et al
as 14-15705
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAVON TAMAR WILLIAMS, AKA Javon Williams
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, County Assesor at 4th Avenue Jail, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, named as: United States Department of Treasury - Facilities Management at Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, named as: Securities Exchange Commission - Head of Commodities Commission at New York World Trade Center (Trade Fund) and others
Patrick Missud, I v. USDC-CASF
as 14-70572
: In re: PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I
Petitioner: PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Charles Copeland, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-55246
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Creditor - Appellant: TRI TOOL INC.
Defendant: CHARLES P. COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee: COPELAND WEALTH MANAGEMENT, A Financial Advisory Corporation and COPELAND WEALTH MANAGEMENT, A Real Estate Corporation
Movant - Appellee: COPELAND PROPERTIES 18 L.P.
Receiver - Appellee: THOMAS C. HEBRANK
SEC v. Peter Jensen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-55221
Plaintiff - Appellant: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee: PETER L. JENSEN and THOMAS C. TEKULVE, Jr.
SEC v. Charles Copeland, et al
as 13-57039
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: CHARLES P. COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee: COPELAND WEALTH MANAGEMENT, A Financial Advisory Corporation and COPELAND WEALTH MANAGEMENT, A Real Estate Corporation
Movant - Appellant: JANET IHDE, Certain Limited Partners of Copeland Properties Three, Copeland Properties 14 and Copeland Properties 18, SANDRA HAYES, Certain Limited Partners of Copeland Properties Three, Copeland Properties 14 and Copeland Properties 18, MELVYN ROSS, Certain Limited Partners of Copeland Properties Three, Copeland Properties 14 and Copeland Properties 18 and others
Movant - Appellee: COPELAND PROPERTIES 18 L.P.
Receiver - Appellee: THOMAS C. HEBRANK
Joseph Amundsen v. USDC-CASF
as 13-71472
: In re: JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN
Petitioner: JOSEPH S. AMUNDSEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?