Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Armando Ortiz v. Suzan Hubbard, et al
as 10-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO R. ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZAN HUBBARD, M. S. EVANS, M. MOORE and others
Marvin Hollis v. D. Herrick, et al
as 10-15613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN G. HOLLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
D. HERRICK, Licensed Psychiatric, T. SELBY, Correctional Lieutenant, D. SCHLITZ, Correctional Officer and others
In re: Morry Waksberg M.D. Inc.
as 09-56406
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
Appellant:
MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
:
LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, RANKIN & BRILL L.L.P.
Appellee:
ALFRED SIEGEL
Morry Waksberg M.D. Inc.
as 09-56405
Debtor - In Re:
In the Matter of: MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
Debtor - Appellant:
MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
:
LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, RANKIN & BRILL L.L.P.
Appellee:
ALFRED SIEGEL
Morry Waksberg M.D. Inc.
as 09-56405
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of: MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
Debtor:
MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
Not Classified By Court:
LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, RANKIN & BRILL L.L.P.
Appellee:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL
In re: Morry Waksberg M.D. Inc.
as 09-56406
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
Appellant:
MORRY WAKSBERG M.D. INC.
Not Classified By Court:
LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, RANKIN & BRILL L.L.P.
Appellee:
ALFRED H. SIEGEL
Encarnacion Aguilar v. Kuloloia, et al
as 09-16734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENCARNACION AGUILAR
Defendant - Appellee:
KULOLOIA, H.G. REES, FOWLER and others
USA v. Anthony Rankin
as 09-30224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY RANKIN
Anthony Rankin v. USDCFB
as 09-71444
:
In re: ANTHONY RANKIN
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RANKIN
Respondent:
USDC, FAIRBANKS
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John James, III v. Donald Pompan, et al
as 08-17329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. JAMES, III
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD C. POMPAN, BOWMAN, Doctor, HELMER, Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
