Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 477
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15886
Plaintiff / Appellee: ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant: KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant: ANDRE GRIFFIN, RAYANN KRUM, CHRISTOPHER MOSS and others
Kenneth Bell v. USA
as 22-70117
Petitioner: KENNETH M. BELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 22-55557
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY BEARD, PHD: Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. Groves, et al
as 22-55513
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLIE B. BELLS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: GROVES, Correction Officer and JOHN DOES
Defendant: SMITH, Correction Officer and FLOREZ
Michael Wright v. Contra Costa Country, et al
as 22-15719
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee: CONTRA COSTA COUNTRY, DEVON BELL and MARK PETTERSON
Kevin Moore v. Price, et al
as 22-15682
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN E. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee: PRICE, PARSONS, WALLS and others
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15579
Plaintiff / Appellee: ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant: REGINALD ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant: ANDRE GRIFFIN, RAYANN KRUM, CHRISTOPHER MOSS and others
Daniel Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Estate, et al
as 22-15523
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL GONZALEZ
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL ESTATE, A California State Agency, KYLE THOMAS JONES, TRICIA SOMMERS and others
Defendant: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC, HSBC BANK USA, N.A., as trustee for Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group, Inc. Securitization name-FBRSI 2005-4 HSBC, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and others
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15363
Plaintiff / Appellee: ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant: AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE, CRITICAL RESISTANCE, LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS WITH CHILDREN and others
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant: ANDRE GRIFFIN, RAYANN KRUM, CHRISTOPHER MOSS and others
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15353
Plaintiff / Appellee: ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant: KEVIN LEE MCCULLOM
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant: ANDRE GRIFFIN, RAYANN KRUM, CHRISTOPHER MOSS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?