Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56377
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of California, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-17214
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MAINE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his official capacity as Acting Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, a federal agency, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, a federal agency and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL HOUSING LAW PROJECT, FOOD RESEARCH & ACTION CENTER, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSING and others
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner: LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 12-17808
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOES, 1-25, JOHN DOES, 1-25, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii and others
Amicus Curiae: THE FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., HAWAII RIFLE ASSOCIATION, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGE K. YOUNG, Jr.
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55731
Defendant / Appellee: LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUD ROSSMANN
Michelle Flanagan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 18-55717
Amicus Curiae: GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., DOMINIC NARDONE, SAMUEL GOLDEN and others
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California and JAMES MCDONNELL, Sheriff of Los Angeles County
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant: DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55359
Defendant / Appellee: LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUD ROSSMANN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?