Cases 41 - 50 of 59
William Sakeagak v. Earl Houser
as 19-72192
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ARTHUR SAKEAGAK
Respondent:
EARL L. HOUSER
Kevin Frank v. Earl Houser
as 19-35580
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN H. FRANK
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER
Stephen Harmon v. Earl Houser, et al
as 19-35093
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALASKA and EARL L. HOUSER, Superintendent of Goose Creek Cor. Cnt.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN HARMON
Edward Gardner v. Earl Houser
as 18-70738
Petitioner:
EDWARD Y. GARDNER
Respondent:
EARL HOUSER, Superintendent
Kelly Crowe v. Rama Gogineni, et al
as 17-17231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY CROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMA GOGINENI and BULLIVANT, HOUSER, BAILEY, P.C., an Oregon corporation
Michael Pence, et al v. State of Arizona, et al
as 17-16490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. PENCE and TAUNI R. PENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel., Superior Court of Maricopa County, BRIAN REES, Commissioner, KEVIN COOK, Ziev, Broadnax & Steele LLP and others
Barry Stull v. Lewis & Clark College, et al
as 14-35680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY JOE STULL
Defendant - Appellee:
LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE, NICHOLAS L. DAZER, TIM O'DWYER and others
Ashley Fleming, et al v. Commander Tor Bjornstad, et al
as 13-36191
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY FLEMING
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMANDER TOR BJORNSTAD, individually and in his official capacity, DETECTIVE JEFF HERBIG, individually and in his official capacity, OFFICER SEAN LINDROS, individually and in his official capacity and others
Kelly Crowe v. Rama Gogineni, et al
as 13-15973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY CROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMA GOGINENI and BULLIVANT, HOUSER, BAILEY, P.C., an Oregon corporation
Jennie Crawford, et al v. Mylan Inc., et al
as 13-80083
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JENNIE CRAWFORD, HERSCHEL DOSIER, MARTHA KRAWCZYK and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
MYLAN INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
