Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Ana Solano-Ramirez, et al v. William Barr
as 19-73059
Petitioner:
ANA CATALINA SOLANO-RAMIREZ and ERIC MOISES SOLANO-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Jose Parra-Avalos
as 19-10345
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE GUADALUPE PARRA-AVALOS, AKA Jose Parra-Zavala, AKA Moises Placencia
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arnold Rodriguez Sarmiento v. William Barr
as 19-72349
Petitioner:
ARNOLD MOISES RODRIGUEZ SARMIENTO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Moises Barragan v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 19-16804
Respondent / Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ADAM LAXALT, Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOISES BARRAGAN
Moises Lopez-Vasquez v. William Barr
as 19-72326
Petitioner:
MOISES LOPEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Moises Villanueva v. William Barr
as 19-71465
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
MOISES VILLANUEVA
Moises Negrete, et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., et al
as 19-80047
Not Yet Classified:
ABRAHAM IBARRA, FELIX VILLELA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, FELICIA AVILA and others
Defendant:
BLOOMFIELD BAKERS, LLC, a California limited liability company, RALSTON FOODS, INC., a Nevada corporation, DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive and others
Moises Perez-Esparza v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71951
Petitioner:
MOISES PEREZ-ESPARZA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Moises Cabrera-Piedra v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71342
Petitioner:
MOISES CABRERA-PIEDRA, AKA Pedro Pantoja-Piedra
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Moises Ponce Alvarez v. King County, et al
as 18-35382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOISES E. PONCE ALVAREZ
Defendant:
KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM R. BUCHAN, in his individual capacity, JONATHAN HENNESSY, in his individual capacity, JAMES PRICE, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
