Cases 51 - 60 of 900
Tony Deng v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15529
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY DENG
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jordan Billups v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15301
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORDAN DONALD BILLUPS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael McKerlie v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15332
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCKERLIE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael Cook v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15185
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LYNN COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jeffrey Bucholtz v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15305
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY GLENN BUCHOLTZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Darien Jackson v. Attorney General for the State of Arizona, et al
as 23-15021
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARIEN MAURICE JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Stewart Younan v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-17019
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEWART EDWARD YOUNAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael Crane v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15031
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE CRANE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, UNKNOWN FREELAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Fox Salerno v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 23-15126
Petitioner / Appellant:
FOX JOSEPH SALERNO
Respondent / Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jay Thomas v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15194
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAY CAMERON THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
