Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Nina Griffin v. Countrywide Home Loans Servici, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15288
Plaintiff - Appellant: NINA S. GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a subsidiary on behalf of MERSCORP, Inc., RECON TRUST COMPANY NA and others
Myer Sankary v. Nina Ringgold, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55063
Plaintiff - Appellee: MYER SANKARY
Defendant - Appellant: NINA RINGGOLD, in her capacity as Named Trustee of the Inter Vivos Trust of the Aubry Family Trust and JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART
In re: In Re: Hartford Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55039
: In re: HARTFORD LITIGATION CASES
Plaintiff - Appellee: HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, de facto plaintiff defendant, THE RULE COMPANY INCORPORATED, de facto plaintiff defendant, CRAIG PONCI, de facto plaintiff defendant and others
Defendant - Appellant: CORNELIUS TURNER, de facto defendant and plaintiff, LISA TURNER, de facto defendant and plaintiff, MARIAN TURNER, de facto defendant and plaintiff and others
Myer Sankary, et al v. Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55040
Plaintiff - Appellee: MYER J. SANKARY
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, Division Five, Presiding Justice Paul Turner
Defendant: JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART
Defendant - Appellant: GRETA CURTIS, Esquire, Defendants Non-Parties, LAW OFFICES OF GRETA CURTIS, Defendants Non-Parties, NINA RINGGOLD and others
Liana Peshkepia-Cadena, et al v. SunTrust Bank, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55012
Plaintiff - Appellant: LIANA PESHKEPIA-CADENA, NINA LAUREN MUNDEN and CHRIS CADENA
Defendant - Appellee: SUNTRUST BANK, MTC FINANCIAL SERVICES, US BANK NA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 12-16828
Plaintiff - Appellant: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee: JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 12-72500
: In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Felipe Campos v. Oscar Fernandez, et al
as 12-56138
Plaintiff - Appellant: FELIPE CAMPOS, AKA Philip A. Fields
Defendant - Appellee: OSCAR HUGO NINA FERNANDEZ, Commander National Police and EVO MORALES AYMA, President of the State of Bolivia
Nina Lowe-Malone v. Michael Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55841
Plaintiff - Appellant: NINA LOWE-MALONE
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Adminstration
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Myer J. Sankary, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-57247
Plaintiff - Appellant: JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee: TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MYER J. SANKARY, AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?