Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Alvarado Botello v. Garland
as 23-1820
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE ALVARADO BOTELLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cabada-Botello v. Garland
as 23-1338
Petitioner:
JONATAN CABADA-BOTELLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Todd Hezlitt v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD HEZLITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, individual capacity, MATTHEW BOTELLO, HEYWOOD CREWS and others
Shawn Moore v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN DALE MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director, CHARLES L RYAN, Former Director, TRUJILLO, Regional Director, Unknown and others
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee:
HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Christian Botello v. Darling Ingredients, Inc., et al
as 21-56225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN BOTELLO
Defendant / Appellee:
DARLING INGREDIENTS, INC. and DOES, 1 through 100
Herron Adams v. Lina Manglicmot, et al
as 21-16554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERRON A. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LINA MANGLICMOT, Registered Nurse at Correctional Training Facility, CHINYERE ANUDOKEM, Registered Nurse at Correctional Training Facility, ROBERT DELUNA, Registered Nurse at Correctional Training Facility and others
Botello-Madrigal v. Garland
as 21-97
Petitioner:
AGUSTIN BOTELLO-MADRIGAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Victor Garcia
as 19-10329
Defendant / Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL GARCIA, AKA Victor Campos Botello, AKA Victor Manuel Garcia Campos
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Metcalf, et al
as 19-16867
Defendant / Appellee:
METCALF, Correctional Officer, S. DUNAVEN and BOTELLO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
