Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Celestin Tappin, Jr. v. Fernandies Frazier
as 23-70021
Petitioner:
CELESTIN GLENN TAPPIIN, Jr.
Respondent:
FERNANDIES FRAZIER
Tyrel Brannon v. Orozco, et al
as 22-16728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREL GERRARD BRANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
OROZCO, Sgt., A. PACHECO, C/O, COVARRUBIAS, Sgt. and others
The Bank of New York Mellon, et al v. Eugenia Celestin, et al
as 16-56179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, formerly known as The Bank of New York, as Trutee for the Certificate Holders CWALT, Inc. Alternative Loan Trust 2007-HY6 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-HY6 and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
EUGENIA MANCERA CELESTIN, an individual, SEDRICK CELESTIN, an individual, ANTHONY ACEVEDO and others
Marie Lueck, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
as 13-80193
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARIE LUECK, ANGELA ANDRE, ROBERT D. LUECK and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
Eugenia Mancera-Celestin, et al v. Brian Moynihan, et al
as 12-55569
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENIA MANCERA-CELESTIN and SEDRICK CELESTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Aka Tanoh, et al v. Dow Chemical Company
as 09-55138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AKA RAYMOND TANOH, ASSYE EUGENE TANOH, OTCHOUMOU JEAN MARIE TANOH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation
Aka Raymond Tanoh, et al v. Dow Chemical Company
as 08-56917
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASSYE EUGENE TANOH, AKA RAYMOND TANOH, OTCHOUMOU JEAN MARIE TANOH and others
Defendant:
AMVAC CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a California Corporation, SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, DOLE FOOD COMPANY INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Aka Tanoh v. Dow Chemical Company
as 08-80169
Plaintiff - Respondent:
AKA RAYMOND TANOH, ASSYE EUGENE TANOH, OTCHOUMOU JEAN MARIE TANOH and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
