Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15005
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jason Tellez, et al v. Gold Road Mining Corporation, et al
as 21-16166
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON ANTHONY TELLEZ and CHRISTINE MARIE TELLEZ, Husband and Wife
Defendant / Appellee: GOLD ROAD MINING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Z79 RESOURCES, INC., a Delaware corporation, FKA Z79 Gold (USA) Corporation, FOUR C RESOURCES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and others
Jes Solar Company Limited, et al v. Matinee Energy Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16015
Defendant / Appellee: TONG SOO CHUNG, husband and S. CHIN KIM, husband
Defendant: JEOUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Jeoung, wife, PAUL JEOUNG, husband, CHUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Chung, wife and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AIRPARK COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation, HANKOOK TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a South Korean Corporation and JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation
Anita Crider v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., et al
as 20-17454
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does I-V; Jane Does I-V; ABC Corporation I-V; XYZ Partnership I-V and AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC., DBA Brunswick Via Linda Lanes
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANITA CRIDER
Jeffrey Connell, et al v. Lima Corporate, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35797
Defendant / Appellee: LIMA USA, INC., an Indiana corporation and LIMA CORPORATE
Defendant: DJO GLOBAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, ENCORE MEDICAL LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership and DOE CORPORATIONS, John Doe Corporations I-V
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANET CONNELL and JEFFREY D. CONNELL
Jes Solar Company Limited, et al v. Matinee Energy Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16748
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN S. LEE, husband, TONG SOO CHUNG, husband, PAUL JEOUNG, husband and others
Defendant: CHUN RAE KIM, husband, JEOUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Jeoung, wife, CHUNG, First Name Unknown; named as Jane Doe Chung, wife and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HANKOOK TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a South Korean Corporation, JES SOLAR COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation and AIRPARK COMPANY LIMITED, a South Korean Corporation
Laquinn Fisher v. City of Mesa, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-16661
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAQUINN FISHER, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MESA, UNKNOWN CAMPBELL, named as Sgt. Campbell (Badge No. 10729), invidually and acting on behalf of the the Mesa Police Department, UNKNOWN SPOUSE CAMPBELL, named as Jane Doe Campbell and others
Sandra Dowling, et al v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 12-15855
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA DOWLING and DENNIS DOWLING, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, AVA ARPAIO, husband and wife, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS and others
Helen Reader v. Bank of America NA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15205
Plaintiff - Appellant: HELEN E. READER
Defendant - Appellee: BANK OF AMERICA NA, a Texas limited partnership, successor in interest to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, a New York corporation/ erroneously named as: Bank of New York Mellon/ allegedly: trustee of Certificate Holders of CWMBS, Mortgage-Backed Securities, Series CHL2007-7, RECONTRUST COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Richard Sampson v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 11-17978
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD SAMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, RECONTRUST COMPANY NA and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: John Does and Jane Does I-X, ABC Corporations I-V, XYZ Parterships I-V, ABC LLCs I-V, XYZ Trusts I-V, and John Does (Investors) 1-10,000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?