Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Corrine Thomas, et al v. County of Humboldt, et al
as 23-15847
Plaintiff / Appellant: CORRINE MORGAN THOMAS, DOUG THOMAS, BLU GRAHAM and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, California, HUMBOLDT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HUMBOLDT COUNTY PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant: VIRGINA BASS, Chair, Board of Supervisors
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Laney Sweet, et al v. LQ Management LLC, et al
as 22-15771
Plaintiff / Appellant: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff: GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellee: LQ MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant: PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CHARLES J. LANGLEY and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Philip Brailsford, et al
as 22-15269
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff: GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant: PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD and CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife
Defendant: CHARLES J. LANGLEY, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation, BRIAN ELMORE and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Charles Langley, et al
as 22-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff: GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES J. LANGLEY
Defendant: PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation and others
Cindy Alegre, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55070
Plaintiff / Appellant: CINDY ALEGRE, FRANK ALEGRE, MICHAEL ALEGRE and others
Defendant / Appellee: SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Department of Interior, United States of America, in her official capacity, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, Assistant Secretary of the Department of Interior - Indian Affairs, United States of America, in his official capacity, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior - United States of America, in his official capacity and others
Michael Gallegos v. Corrine Vorenkamp, et al
as 12-35782
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL E. GALLEGOS
Defendant - Appellee: CORRINE VORENKAMP, District Attorney, NICOLE B. SCHICK, Magistrate, ALICE M. RASLEY, Magistrate and others
Caleb Kleppner, et al v. Leslie Yager
as 08-57037
: In re: REFORMULATED GASOLINE (RFG) ANTITRUST AND PATENT LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: CALEB KLEPPNER, STEPHEN BUCKSER, HENRY DAVIS and others
Appellant: LESLIE YAGAR
Appellee: BEVERLY L. TSE, Esquire and CY PRES GRANTS ADMINISTRATORS
Defendant: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA and UNOCAL CORPORATION
Bill Apana, et al v. TIG Insurance Company, et al
as 08-17148
Plaintiff - Appellee: BILL H. APANA, Personal Representative of the Estate of Corrine Apana and CORRINE APANA, executor
Defendant - Appellant: TIG INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10
Type: Contract Insurance
Bill Apana, et al v. TIG Insurance Company, et al
as 08-15550
Plaintiff - Appellee: BILL H. APANA, Personal Representative of the Estate of Corrine Apana and CORRINE APANA, executor
Defendant - Appellant: TIG INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?