Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sarah Vitort v. Kroger Company
as 22-35185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH VITORT, a consumer residing in Oregon, individually and on behalf of all others situated
Defendant / Appellee:
KROGER COMPANY, FRED MEYER STORES, INC., an Ohio corporation and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Pilrang Owa v. Fred Meyer Stores Incoporated, et al
as 18-35531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PILRANG BAE OWA
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED MEYER STORES INCOPORATED, Western region subsidiary corporation of The Kroger Company and ADVANCED FRESH CONCEPTS FRANCHISE CORPORATION
Law Project for Psychiatric Ri, et al v. Osamu Matsutani, et al
as 10-35887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAW PROJECT FOR PSYCHIATRIC RIGHTS, ex rel. United States of America and DANIEL I. GRIFFIN, ex rel. United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
OSAMU H. MATSUTANI, MD, WILLIAM HOGAN, individually and as Commissioner of the Department of Health and Social Services, TAMMY SANDOVAL, individually and as Director of the Alaska Office of Children's Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-35860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NLRB v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 10-72652
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
FRED MEYER STORES, INC.
NLRB v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.
as 10-72651
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
FRED MEYER STORES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-35928
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-35931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-35597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Evje v. Fred Meyer Stores,
as 08-35135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHRYN EVJE, a single woman
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED MEYER STORES, INC., an Ohip Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
