Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 14-56603
Petitioner - Appellant:
NINA RINGGOLD, ALI TAZHIBI and ASAP COPY AND PRINT
Respondent - Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Marie Potter v. General Electric Capital Corpo, et al
as 14-35694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE POTTER
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY and WMC MORTGAGE LLC
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72345
:
In re: NINA RINGGOLD, ALI TAZHIBI and ASAP COPY AND PRINT
Petitioner:
NINA RINGGOLD, ALI TAZHIBI, DBA ASAP Copy and Print and ASAP COPY AND PRINT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
ASAP Copy and Print, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-71589
:
In re: ASAP COPY AND PRINT, ALI TAZHIBI and NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner:
ASAP COPY AND PRINT, ALI TAZHIBI, DBA ASAP Copy and Print and NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35446
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Canon Business Solutions, Inc., et al v. ASAP Copy and Print, et al
as 13-55803
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ASAP COPY AND PRINT, ALI TAZHIBI, DBA ASAP Copy Print, NINA R. RINGGOLD, Esq. and others
Canon Business Solutions, Inc., et al v. ASAP Copy and Print, et al
as 13-55307
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP, CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ASAP COPY AND PRINT, ALI TAZHIBI, DBA ASAP Copy Print, NINA R. RINGGOLD, Esq. and others
SEC v. PlainsCapital Bank, et al
as 09-35859
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor - Appellant:
PLAINSCAPITAL BANK
Intervenor:
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY, RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUNWEST MANAGEMENT, INC., CANYON CREEK DEVELOPMENT, INC., CANYON CREEK FINANCIAL, LLC and others
Receiver - Appellee:
MICHAEL GRASSMUECK
SEC, et al v. ING USA Annuity Life Insurance, et al
as 09-35250
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
ING USA ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY, RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUNWEST MANAGEMENT, INC., CANYON CREEK DEVELOPMENT, INC., CANYON CREEK FINANCIAL, LLC and others
Movant - Appellee:
CAPMARK FINANCE, INC., MARATHON ASSET MANAGEMENT, L.P. and PA ARDBROOK LLC
Receiver - Appellee:
MICHAEL GRASSMUECK
S. Steinmetz v. GE, et al
as 09-55404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
S. D. STEINMETZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
