Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hercules v. Garland
as 23-7
Petitioner:
HECTOR ANTONIO HERCULES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flor Hercules Henriquez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70786
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
ODALIS BELINDA HENRIQUEZ HERCULES and FLOR IDALIA HERCULES HENRIQUEZ
Marlon Altamirano, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMOR JACOB DELEON, MANUEL TEJEDA, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Former Warden Avenal State Prison and others
Arconic, Inc., et al v. APC Investment Co., et al
as 19-55181
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST DICE ROAD COMPANY, INC., POWERINE OIL COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PILKINGTON GROUP LIMITED, CALIFORNIA HYDROFORMING COMPANY, INC., ARLON, LLC and others
Eber Portillo-Hercules v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72344
Petitioner:
EBER ISAI PORTILLO-HERCULES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Donald Aviles-Hercules v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73364
Petitioner:
DONALD E. AVILES-HERCULES, AKA Donald E. Avileshercules
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Hector Hercules v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71193
Petitioner:
HECTOR ANTONIO HERCULES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Yasha Hercules v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72451
Petitioner:
YASHA JERRY HERCULES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Eber Portillo-Hercules v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70523
Petitioner:
EBER ISAI PORTILLO-HERCULES, AKA Heber Isai Portillo-Hercules
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ronald Moore v. Hercules Dynamite Co.
as 10-16890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
HERCULES DYNAMITE CO.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
