Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ruben Valdez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 19-16123
Defendant / Appellee:
L. WALLACE, Assistant Institutional Gang Investigator, CSP - Sacramento, SCOTT, TIM V. VIRGA, Warden, CSP - Sacramento and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant:
D. FOSTON, J. MAYHEW, Institutional Gang Investigator Lieutenant, CSP - Sacramento and D. STARK, Appeals Examiner, IAB
Carlos Almeida v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 17-16302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS ALMEIDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, R. BELL, Assistant Warden, D. GONGORA and others
Ruben Valdez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 16-16948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, California Department of Corrections, TIM V. VIRGA, Warden, L. JOHNSON-DOVEY, Associate Warden, CSP-Sacramento and others
Ruben Valdez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-15758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, TIM VIRGA, Warden, L. JOHNSON-DOVEY, Associate Warden, CSP-Sacramento and others
William Jamison, et al v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd'
as 12-17412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMISON, GEORGE SULLIVAN, JOAN ADELE SULLIVAN, husband and wife and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S UNDER POLICY NO. B0146LDUSA0701030
Alfred Sandoval v. D. Barneburg, et al
as 11-15024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED ARTHUR SANDOVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BARNEBURG, Sergeant, J. BEESON, Sergeant, C. COUNTESS, Correctional Officer and others
Ruben Ruiz v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-15479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN JOSEPH RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director CDCR, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, DOUGLAS MCCLURE, Special Agent and others
William Charles, Sr. v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY CHARLES, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, MIKE MCDONALD, R. L. GOWER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
