Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Chavez v. Garland
as 24-3489
Petitioner:
JOSE FERNANDO CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez Mireles v. Garland
as 24-3074
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS CHAVEZ MIRELES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chavez-Flamenco v. Garland
as 22-1877
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO CHAVEZ-FLAMENCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martin Ruiz v. Miguel Marquez, et al
as 20-16962
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL MARQUEZ MARQUEZ, Guanajuato State Governor, MONSERRAT MARTINEZ SHOWS, Attorney, Secretary of Transparency and Render an Accounts of the Guanajuato State Government, ANGELICA RAMIREZ MORALEZ, Attorney, General Director of Labor, Subsecretary of Labor and Social Prevention and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN MORENO RUIZ
Jose Gonzalez Chavez v. William Barr
as 20-72702
Petitioner:
JOSE GONZALEZ CHAVEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Marlon Altamirano, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMOR JACOB DELEON, MANUEL TEJEDA, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Former Warden Avenal State Prison and others
Jose Chavez v. USA
as 18-72333
Petitioner:
JOSE MARIANO CHAVEZ, AKA Pelucas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Chavez-Chavez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71021
Petitioner:
JOSE ARISTIDES CHAVEZ-CHAVEZ
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Jose Chavez
as 17-55188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MARIANO CHAVEZ, AKA Pelucas
Jose Chavez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-73697
Petitioner:
JOSE M. CHAVEZ, AKA Jose Macias Chavez, AKA Jose Macias-Chavez
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
