Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pedro Rodriguez v. Arthur Anderson, et al
as 21-55672
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, Commissioner, individual and official capacity, W. MCCULLOUGH, Appeals Coordinator, individual and official capacity, CYNTHIA FRITZ, Commissioner, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ
Pedro Rodriguez v. Arthur Anderson, et al
as 19-56434
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, individual and official capacity, ALLI ZARRIN-NAM, Commissioner, individual and official capacity, CYNTHIA FRITZ, Commissioner, individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, AKA Pedro Luis Rodriguez
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 17-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Shawn Hawk v. CDCR, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-16885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN HAWK
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, FORENSIC ASSESSMENT DIVISION and others
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Oshay Johnson v. CDCR, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-16712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSHAY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, BRIAN DUFFY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.