Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Vazquez v. Nielsen, et al.
as 23-3610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONETTE VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration), Agency and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration)
Huifang Zhang, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-56191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUIFANG ZHANG, on behalf of I.G. and D.G., SHUNICHI TAKAHASHI and TOSHIYUKI TAKAHASHI
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15324
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization and RAUL M. GRIJALVA, U.S. Representative, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee:
PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 21-55941
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FAOUR ABDALLAH FRAIHAT, MARCO MONTOYA AMAYA, RAUL ALCOCER CHAVEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
La Clinica De La Raza, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FARMWORKER JUSTICE, LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ACCESS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his Official Capacity as President of the United States, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, in his Official Capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Mohammad Sharif Khalil v. L. Cissna, et al
as 20-55323
Defendant / Appellee:
L. FRANCIS CISSNA, in his capacity as Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, LOREN K. MILLER, in his capacity as Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Service Center Operations, Nebraska Service Center and KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMMAD SHARIF KHALIL
Mario Ixchop Perez v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 20-15511
Respondent:
ERIK BONNAR, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN and others
Petitioner:
MARIO ALEXANDER IXCHOP PEREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
