Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Reed v. Eugene School District 4J, et al.
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL REED, as Next of Friend to M.R.
Defendant:
EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J, PAULA MCCOWN, JONATHAN ANDREW DEY, JR. and others
Wilkins v. Herron, et al.
as 24-80
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH M. WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE HERRON, CHAD LOWE, STEVEN COOK and others
United States of America v. Jones
as 23-3387
Defendant / Appellant:
LORENZO LARON JONES and Low Down
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Justin Downing v. LOW, et al
as 23-16102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN DOWNING, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., a North Carolina corporation, FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Barnett v. Polk Co. Jail, et al.
as 23-1672
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW LAUD BARNETT and Anthony Andrew Delrossey
Defendant / Appellee:
POLK CO. JAIL, MARK GARTON, JEFF ISHAM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aaron LoweIn re: Aaron Lowe
as 23-80009
Respondent:
In re: AARON L. LOWE, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 12, 1987
Hill Phoenix, Inc. v. Classic Refrigeration SoCal, Inc., et al
as 22-55716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HILL PHOENIX, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
CLASSIC REFRIGERATION SOCAL, INC., a California corporation and DAVID ROGERS, an individual
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVID LOWE, an individual
USA v. Danny Lowe
as 22-35935
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANNY RAY LOWE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
