Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 99
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. trx.com, et al.
as 24-3391
Plaintiff: JFXD TRX ACQ LLC
Defendant: TRX.COM and LOO TZE MING
Lin v. Garland
as 24-3165
Petitioner: HUA-MING LIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
JFXD TRX ACQ LLC v. trx.com, et al.
as 24-1661
Plaintiff: JFXD TRX ACQ LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Defendant: TRX.COM, a domain name and LOO TZE MING, an individual from Malaysia
Xue v. Garland
as 22-1616
Petitioner: MING QING XUE
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael Weiss v. Peggy Lin, et al
as 22-55877
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL ALAN WEISS, as Executor of Estate of Jane L. Marsh
Defendant / Appellee: PEGGY PEI LIN and YI MING SU, YuYu Ming
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 10
Kevin Webber v. Unknown Party, et al
as 22-15721
Petitioner / Appellant: KEVIN J. WEBBER
Respondent / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTY, Named as Ming Florence, Eyman Complex
Respondent: STATE OF ARIZONA
U.S. Bank National Association v. Quartzburg Gold LP, et al
as 22-35146
Plaintiff / Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee: QUARTZBURG GOLD LP and IDAHO STATE REGIONAL CENTER LLC
Defendant / Appellant: YING LIN and YUN HUANG
Defendant: YUNTIAN DENG, WEIWEI YAN, WEICHENG LI and others
Wang v. Garland
as 21-1162
Petitioner: SHIYOU WANG and MING MA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Norman Herterich v. Mary Wiss, et al
as 21-16746
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORMAN BARTSCH HERTERICH
Defendant / Appellee: MARY E. WISS, ROBERT L. DONDERO, SANDRA L. MARGULIES and others
Tony Fu v. City and County of San Franci, et al
as 21-15423
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and MATTHEW P. SULLIVAN, an individual and in his official capacities
Defendant: MARK W. LAPHAM, Esquire, THAI MING CHU, LEGAL RECOVERY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TONY FU

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?