Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, et al
as 22-55496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE SAWICKY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAO SYKES, Manuel Real Beneficiary, PERCY ANDERSON, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ and others
Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta, et al
as 21-56147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON RAISER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MURRIETA, MICHAEL JACOBS, RICK GIBBS and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, Honorable, MANUEL L. REAL, Administrative Law Judge, Honorable, DOLLY M. GEE, Honorable and others
Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta, et al
as 20-55614
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MURRIETA, MICHAEL JACOBS, RICK GIBBS and others
Defendant:
MANUEL L. REAL, Administrative Law Judge, Honorable, S. JAMES OTERO, Honorable, DOLLY M. GEE, Honorable and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON RAISER
Percy Anderson, Sr. v. District Attorney's Office, et al
as 13-56323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY ANDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, San Diego, SHELLY PAULE, TONYA SLOAN and others
Percy Anderson, Sr. v. Health & Human Services Agency, et al
as 13-56320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY ANDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, San Diego, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, TONYA SLOAN and others
Percy Anderson, Sr. v. County of San Diego, et al
as 13-56317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY ANDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, SHELLY PAULE and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 12-56960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, JOYCE L. KENNARD, MARVIN R. BAXTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
