Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Matthew Creamer v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-17750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW RONALD CREAMER, AKA Matthew R. Creamer
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, GENE GREELEY, ROBERT A. WHITE, Dr. and others
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-16990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADOC, CHRIS MENDOZA, Deputy Warden at ASPC, MICHAEL ADU-TUTU, Deputy Director (ADOC) Inmate Health Services and others
Enrique Mendez v. State of Arizona, et al
as 11-16911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENRIQUE MENDEZ, AKA Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, THOMAS C. HORNE, RICHARD ROWE, Dr. and others
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-16253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of ADOC, MENDOZA, named as John Doe Mendoza, Deputy Warden, ADU-TUTU, Deputy Director (ADOC) Inmate Health Services and others
Jonathan Bertanelli v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 11-15045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN CATALDO BERTANELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, UNKNOWN MENDOZA, Deputy Warden at ADOC, UNKNOWN ADU-TUTU, Director of Medical Services at ADOC and others
Dushan Nickolich, II v. Richard Rowe
as 10-17623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSHAN STEPHAN NICKOLICH, II
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ROWE
James Burgoyne v. Doris Shriro, et al
as 10-15557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN BURGOYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
DORIS SHRIRO, Director at Arizona Department of Corrections, CARONDELET HEALTH SERVICES INC, ASPC-FHA, Medical Service Providers, RICHARD ROWE, Doctor and others
James Burgoyne v. Doris Shriro, et al
as 08-16972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN BURGOYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
DORIS SHRIRO, Director at Arizona Department of Corrections, CARONDELET HEALTH SERVICES INC, ASPC-FHA, Medical Service Providers, RICHARD ROWE, Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
