Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Meyer, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-164
Plaintiff / Appellant: RANDALL KELLY MEYER
Plaintiff: SAMS ANTICS INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, STATE OF NEBRASKA, MIKE HILGERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska and others
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee: MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
North American Meat Institute v. Xavier Becerra, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56408
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, SONIA ANGELL, Dr., Director of the California Department of Public Health and KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, THE HUMANE LEAGUE, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTH AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF UTAH and others
State of Nevada v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-15202
Defendant / Appellee: RICK PERRY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy, LISA E. GORDON, in her official capacity as Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration and Undersecretary for Nuclear Security, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF NEVADA
Christopher Johnson v. County of Greenville, et al
as 18-16532
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF GREENVILLE, employer of Christopher T. Posey, CHRISTOPHER T. POSEY, attorney, individual and official capacity, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, employer of Karen Ratigan and others
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant: AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?