Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al
as 17-17144
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, CALIFORNIA RIFLE & PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., LORI RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 12-17808
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOES, 1-25, JOHN DOES, 1-25, NEIL ABERCROMBIE, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii and others
Amicus Curiae: THE FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., HAWAII RIFLE ASSOCIATION, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGE K. YOUNG, Jr.
Ivan Pena, et al v. Stephen Lindley
as 15-15449
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.,, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROY VARGAS, DONA CROSTON, BRETT THOMAS and others
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN LINDLEY, Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
John Teixeira, et al v. County of Alameda, et al
as 13-17132
Amicus Curiae: FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, YOUTH ALIVE!, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVE NOBRIGA, JOHN TEIXEIRA, GARY GAMAZA and others
Defendant / Appellee: NATE MILEY, in his official capacity, ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, as a policy making body, WILMA CHAN, in her official capacity and others
Jeff Silvester, et al v. Kamala Harris
as 14-16840
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, ABRAHAM LINCOLN FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JEFF SILVESTER, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., a non-profit organization, BRANDON COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellant: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California, in her official capacity
Lori Rodriguez, et al v. City of San Jose, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17144
Plaintiff - Appellant: LORI RODRIGUEZ, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT and STEVEN VALENTINE
Edward Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 10-56971
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, LESLIE BUNCHER, Dr., MICHELLE LAXSON and others
Intervenor: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae: MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, ROBERT T. DOYLE, Marin County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
Mark Haynie, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-15531
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC., BRENDAN JOHN RICHARDS, MARK AARON HAYNIE and others
Defendant / Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, Attorney General of California (in her official capacity) and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?