Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Tejeda Barojas v. Garland
as 23-197
Petitioner:
CRUZ ALEJANDRO TEJEDA BAROJAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Paz Tejeda v. Garland
as 22-1442
Petitioner:
MONICA KARINA PAZ TEJEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Sillas, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE SILLAS, MARIA SILLAS and MIGUEL SILLAS
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
EDGAR MEJIA, MATTHEW MENDEZ, HAINER HERNANDEZ and others
Victor Tejeda, Jr. v. Susan Washburn
as 21-35581
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TEJEDA, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
SUSAN WASHBURN
USA v. Alex Tejeda
as 21-30103
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX JOSE TEJEDA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claudia Tejeda-Pereda v. William Barr
as 20-73252
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA TEJEDA-PEREDA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Arnulfo Gomez Tejeda
as 20-30079
Defendant / Appellant:
ARNULFO GOMEZ TEJEDA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marlon Altamirano, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELMOR JACOB DELEON, MANUEL TEJEDA, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Former Warden Avenal State Prison and others
Andrew Alaniz, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 19-17103
Defendant / Appellee:
TANYA ROTHCHILD, Former Chief of the Classification Services Unit, TERESA SCHWARTZ, Former Director, Division of Adult Institutions, MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO MONTANO, SOKHA HINN, ANDREW ALANIZ and others
Monica Paz-Tejeda v. William Barr
as 19-71219
Petitioner:
MONICA KARINA PAZ-TEJEDA, AKA Monica K. Salamanca
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
