Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Patrick Missud, I v. State of California, et al
as 13-15357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK ALEXANDRE MISSUD, I
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and others
Augustine Fallay v. CCSF, et al
as 10-16437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUGUSTINE FALLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION, DAVID CARR and others
John Champagne, Jr., et al v. The City and County of San Fra, et al
as 08-17503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN F. CHAMPAGNE, Jr. and GARY A. CHAMPAGNE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION, an authorized agency of the City and County of San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT, an authorized agency of the City and County of San Francisco and others
Regan Trust v. CCSF, et al
as 08-17444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGAN CARROLL TRUST
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION, SAN FRANCISCO BUILDING INSPECTION COMMISSION and others
John Champagne, Jr., et al v. The City and County of San Fra, et al
as 08-17180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN F. CHAMPAGNE, Jr. and GARY A. CHAMPAGNE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION, an authorized agency of the City and County of San Francisco, SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT, an authorized agency of the City and County of San Francisco and others
John Champagne, Jr., et al v. The City and County of San Fra, et al
as 08-16368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN F. CHAMPAGNE, Jr.
Plaintiff:
GARY A. CHAMPAGNE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION, SAN FRANCISCO FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
