Cases 21 - 30 of 84,940
ARCpoint Franchise Group LLC et al v. Sadhwani et al
as 8:2024mc00013
Plaintiff:
ARCpoint Franchise Group LLC and ARCpoint Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Sarita Sadhwani and Deepak Hingorani
Korie Schmidt v. Wells Fargo Bank
as 2:2024cv04660
Plaintiff:
Korie Schmidt
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In Re Leslie Klein
as 2:2024cv03543
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Patrick Dunn v. Audiocitywheels, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04686
Defendant:
Audiocitywheels, Inc. and Audiocityusa, Corp.
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dunn
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Guralnik v. Sing for Service, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv04689
Plaintiff:
Alex Guralnik
Defendant:
Sing for Service, LLC doing business as Mepco, Auto Services, LLC, Auto Knight Motor Club, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sapan v. Finance of America Reverse LLC
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Defendant:
Finance of America Reverse LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
