Intellectual Property Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Redmill Tobacco, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08228
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Defendant: Redmill Tobacco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Vape Plus Distribution Corp
as 2:2021cv07469
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Defendant: Vape Plus Distribution Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Eonsmoke LLC et al v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03179
Defendant: James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC, Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Tolmach, Eonsmoke LLC and Gregory Grishayev
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. RSABA, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00503
Defendant: RSABA, Inc.
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. eLiquid Stop
as 2:2020cv06194
Defendant: eLiquid Stop
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. 101 Smoke Shop, Inc.
as 2:2020cv06178
Defendant: 101 Smoke Shop, Inc.
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Cigar Road, Inc.
as 2:2020cv06184
Defendant: Cigar Road, Inc.
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. eCig-City
as 5:2020cv01379
Defendant: eCig-City
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. Lan and Mike International Trading, Inc.
as 2:2018cv09801
Defendant: LAN & MIKE INTERNATIONAL TRADING, INC., VaporDNA and Lan and Mike International Trading, Inc.
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JUUL Labs, Inc. v. VAPE4U, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv02448
Defendant: VAPE4U, LLC
Plaintiff: JUUL Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?