Cases 21 - 30 of 17,831
Nancie Kopesky v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Nancie Kopesky
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michelle Marie Mendoza v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03914
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Mendoza
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Louie Reynoso v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Louie Reynoso
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oscar A. Lopez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Oscar A. Lopez
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Liam Alexander v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Deborah Ann Clark v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
David Duk Kim v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03889
Plaintiff:
David Duk Son Kim
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Walker v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Skyler Robert Walker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lerston Massengale v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv03813
Plaintiff:
Lerston Massengale
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nathan Randall Beahn v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randall Beahn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
