Cases 91 - 100 of 37,610
Espoire Ishibolecho v. Andrews DHS Attorney Gen
as 5:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Espoire Ishibolecho
Respondent:
Andrews DHS Attorney Gen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Justin TerVeer v. Cuevas Plus the People et al
as 2:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Juron D. Ervin v. M. Leon et al
as 5:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Juron D. Ervin
Defendant:
M. Leon, O. Zamora-Rios, C. Romo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl D. McGhee v. California Dept of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Darryl D. McGhee
Defendant:
California Dept of Corrections, John Jane Doe and Linda Lykins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis Tulanda v. Roberto A. Arias
as 2:2024cv03997
Petitioner:
Francis Tulanda
Respondent:
Acting Warden Roberto A. Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jack Benjamin Hessiani v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01034
Petitioner:
Jack Benjamin Hessiani
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Javier Pellecer v. S. Smith
as 2:2024cv04067
Petitioner:
Javier Pellecer
Respondent:
S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Perez v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Richard Perez
Defendant:
Riverside County, Riverside County Sheriffs and Medical Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
